From cell dish to clinic: study types

The index labels every one of its 48 entries by evidence strength, and the kind of study behind a claim is a large part of that label. Below are the study types the index cites, from work outside a living organism to studies that combine human trials. Read the evidence labels for what each tier means and the method page for how they are assigned.

  1. 1

    In vitro

    Studied in cells or tissue in a dish or test tube, outside a living organism.

    3 of 48 compounds mention "in vitro" in their evidence text.

    In vitro in the glossary

  2. 2

    Ex vivo

    Studied in tissue taken from a living organism and kept alive outside it, such as isolated hair follicles.

    1 of 48 compounds mention "ex vivo" in their evidence text.

    Ex vivo in the glossary

  3. 3

    In vivo / animal study

    Studied in a living organism, most often mice or rats. Results frequently fail to carry over to humans.

    21 of 48 compounds mention "animal" in their evidence text.

    In vivo / animal study in the glossary

  4. 4

    Preclinical

    Research done before human testing, in cells and animals.

    1 of 48 compounds mention "preclinical" in their evidence text.

    Preclinical in the glossary

  5. 5

    Case report

    A description of what happened to one patient or a few patients. Useful for spotting rare effects, not for judging how often they occur.

    2 of 48 compounds mention "case report" in their evidence text.

    Case report in the glossary

  6. 6

    Pilot study

    A small early study meant to test feasibility, not to prove an effect.

    1 of 48 compounds mention "pilot" in their evidence text.

    Pilot study in the glossary

  7. 7

    Observational study / cohort

    A study that follows people without assigning a treatment. It can show associations but not cause and effect.

    1 of 48 compounds mention "observational" in their evidence text.

    Observational study / cohort in the glossary

  8. 8

    Randomized controlled trial (RCT)

    A study that assigns people by chance to the treatment or a comparison (often placebo), so differences in outcome can be attributed to the treatment rather than to who chose it.

    16 of 48 compounds mention "rct" in their evidence text.

    Randomized controlled trial (RCT) in the glossary

  9. 9

    Double-blind

    Neither participants nor investigators know who received the treatment until the study ends, which reduces bias in reporting and assessment.

    0 of 48 compounds mention "double-blind" in their evidence text.

    Double-blind in the glossary

  10. 10

    Meta-analysis

    A study that statistically combines the results of several earlier studies on the same question.

    0 of 48 compounds mention "meta-analysis" in their evidence text.

    Meta-analysis in the glossary

Related terms

  • Retrospective study

    A study that looks back at existing records rather than following people forward under a plan.

    Retrospective study in the glossary

  • Placebo-controlled

    A study in which the comparison group receives an inactive look-alike, so that expectation effects are present in both groups.

    Placebo-controlled in the glossary

  • Open-label / unblinded

    Everyone knows who received the treatment. Results are more prone to expectation and reporting bias.

    Open-label / unblinded in the glossary

  • Phase 1, 2 and 3 trials

    Phase 1 tests safety and dosing in a small group; phase 2 looks for signs of effect in more people; phase 3 tests effect and safety at scale and usually supports an approval application.

    Phase 1, 2 and 3 trials in the glossary

  • Anecdotal

    A personal report, for example a forum post. Unverified, not controlled, and not evidence that something works or is safe.

    26 of 48 compounds mention "anecdotal" in their evidence text.

    Anecdotal in the glossary

Before you go in

humanpeptides.fyi is an educational index for adults. It summarizes and links to what others have published and reported about peptides and related compounds studied or used in humans. It is not medical advice. Many listed compounds are not approved for human use, and listing one is not a recommendation. Anecdotes are unverified. Images are AI-generated. By continuing, you agree to the Disclaimer and Terms of Use and the Privacy Notice.

Leave

Your answer is saved only in this browser.